U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined One Nation with Brian Kilmeade to discuss the issue of illegal immigrant crime and the extent of Communist China’s influence in the United States. See below for highlights and watch the full interview on YouTube and Rumble. On...
The welding, automotive, aviation maintenance, submarine, shipbuilding, and other defense-related trade industries are facing a workforce shortage. Many service members and veterans possess the skills to excel in trade jobs benefiting the defense industrial base...
The United States will host the 2026 FIFA World Cup, along with Canada and Mexico. Miami was chosen as one of the host cities to hold matches, with additional Florida cities serving as base camps for the competing national teams. The increased tourism activity across...
Oropouche virus is a disease spread to humans by mosquitoes and biting midges that can cause neurological effects and devastating effects on unborn babies. Recent surveillance data reports approximately 40 travel-associated cases of oropouche, in Florida, from...
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, is a bipartisan commission that monitors and reports on international religious freedom. The commission’s authorization is currently...
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) office will host in-person Mobile Office Hours next week to assist constituents with federal casework issues in their respective local communities. These office hours offer constituents who do not live close to one of Senator Rubio’s...
Rubio: “Tough sanctions are exactly what has brought Iran to the table now, and tightening sanctions as we engage diplomatically affords us the opportunity to apply further pressure and force Iran’s leaders to choose between regime survival and a nuclear weapon.”
Rubio: Pressure Iran with tighter sanctions
By Senator Marco Rubio
POLITICO
November 4, 2013
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/marco-rubio-iran-sanctions-99267.html?hp=l1
The reviews are in, and they’re surprisingly positive: Iran showed newfound seriousness during a round of negotiations in Switzerland. President Barack Obama described the meetings as “a constructive beginning.” All involved spoke approvingly of how the tone was different, how the participants finally moved beyond pro forma speeches and how they were able to have a conversation about their differences.
Was this the recently concluded talks with Iran in Geneva? No, it was actually four years ago. That experience should help guide us as we once again tackle the issue of Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
As for the latest round of talks, the Obama administration has been quick to hail them as breaking new ground. “We had detailed technical discussions at a level we have not had before,” a senior administration official told the press on Oct. 16 as the two-day meeting in Geneva came to an end.
What the positive atmospherics gloss over, however, is that the tortuous decadelong history of U.S. and European diplomatic engagement with the country is littered with Iranian feints and the promise of concessions that never occur. The fall 2009 meeting in Geneva is instructive. At those talks, Iran actually agreed in principle to take steps to transfer most of its stockpile of enriched uranium out of the country.
This time, despite the charm offensive from President Hassan Rouhani, Iran’s foreign minister appears to have shown up empty-handed.
In 2009, after the agreement in Geneva, just as now, the Obama administration urged that new sanctions be put on hold to allow time for diplomacy. But Iran’s supposed concessions never materialized, and by the time the Iranian negotiators made it back to Tehran, the deal was doomed.
In October 2009, Iran had around 8,600 centrifuges and just under 1,200 kilograms of uranium enriched to 3.5 percent. In the past four years, Iran has more than doubled its number of centrifuges and now has a stockpile of uranium that is the equivalent of several weapons worth if it is enriched to higher levels, according to the Institute for Science and International Security. The last time we were told to be cautiously optimistic, Iran barely had one weapon’s worth of enriched uranium.
As a presidential candidate, Rouhani, who was not involved in the 2009 talks, boasted of his skill at buying time for the nuclear program to progress, even citing the number of centrifuges Iran was able to install while his negotiations with the Europeans went nowhere.
This strategy has been successful thus far for Tehran. Our indulgence of it has been disastrous.
…
Keep reading here.