Despite the passage of the Rubio-led Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) in 2021, a recent report has revealed that two Xinjiang-based pharmaceutical entities continue to exploit American laws for profit. To uphold the UFLPA, the U.S. Food and Drug...
News
Latest News
ICYMI: Rubio: Cancel Trade Benefits for Offshoring
Cancel Trade Benefits for Offshoring U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) October 31, 2024 Newsweek Last month, President Donald Trump made waves by threatening to impose a tariff on John Deere for moving production to Mexico…. [A]s I said in my own letter to John Deere...
Rubio, Scott Urge Biden-Harris Admin to Address IV Fluid Shortage
Hurricane Helene significantly damaged North Carolina’s Baxter International IV fluid manufacturing plant. Baxter is responsible for producing more than half of the country’s IV fluid supply. This closure has strained the medical community, leading to delays in...
Rubio, Franklin, Colleagues Demand Compensation for Agricultural Land
Hurricanes Helene and Milton brought high winds, flooding, and damage across Florida. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services estimates the total crop and infrastructure losses range from $1.5 to $2.5 billion. The State of Florida has requested...
Rubio, Scott Support Seminole Tribe’s Major Disaster Request
Due to Hurricane Milton's impact on the Seminole Tribe of Florida, their communities, and property, the tribe requested a major disaster declaration to assist in their response and recovery efforts. U.S. Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Rick Scott (R-FL) sent a...
Rubio Requests Investigation Into Potentially Manipulated Research on Puberty Blockers
A National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study failed to publish its findings on the effects of puberty blockers on children years after completing the research. The researchers are concerned their findings would justify puberty blocker bans for minors. Political...
Rubio Asks Department of Commerce to Answer Questions About Huawei Business Dealings With U.S. Companies
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) sent a letter to U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross requesting information concerning Huawei’s orders of semiconductors from American companies.
“I strongly support the actions taken by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) on August 17, 2020, which closed certain loopholes to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) related to Huawei,” Rubio wrote. “These actions were meant to prevent U.S.-developed technology from being used to undermine our own national security. It has been brought to my attention that Huawei is ordering semiconductors from certain U.S.-based chip companies, or through others stockpiling them, with the intent to ship them in the event that those companies are granted individual export licenses (IVLs), or if Huawei is removed from the Entity List.”
The full text of the letter is below.
Dear Secretary Ross:
As you are well versed, due to its ties to the Chinese Communist Party, Huawei continues to pose a significant threat to the U.S. economy, national security, and our critical infrastructure. I strongly support the actions taken by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) on August 17, 2020, which closed certain loopholes to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) related to Huawei. These actions were meant to prevent U.S.-developed technology from being used to undermine our own national security.
It has been brought to my attention that Huawei is ordering semiconductors from certain U.S.-based chip companies, or through others stockpiling them, with the intent to ship them in the event that those companies are granted individual export licenses (IVLs), or if Huawei is removed from the Entity List. Accordingly, I respectfully request responses to the following questions:
- Since August 17, 2020, how many IVLs has BIS approved to U.S. semiconductor manufacturers for the purpose of export, re-export or transfer of any item subject to the EAR to Huawei?
- For each IVL, please explain your policy rationale for approval.
- Absent an IVL, would it be legal for a U.S. semiconductor company to stockpile items subject to the EAR for ultimate export, reexport or transfer to Huawei after September 14, 2020, or to receive compensation from Huawei for doing so?
- If so, what is the policy rationale for allowing such stockpiling?
- Does the Administration have any intent to remove Huawei from the Entity List?
For purposes of this inquiry, “Huawei” means Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd., or any entity with more than 20 percent of the shares of which are ultimately owned by either of the aforementioned. I would appreciate responses to this before December 31, 2020.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,