Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL), a company directly funded and supported by the Chinese Communist Party, continues to pose national security risks to the United States. This past spring, CATL batteries were installed at Camp Lejeune, North...
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) office will host in-person Mobile Office Hours next week to assist constituents with federal casework issues in their respective local communities. These office hours offer constituents who do not live close to one of Senator Rubio’s...
A mysterious respiratory illness is once again spreading in China. Until we know more about what could be a new pathogen, the United States must do everything possible to prevent the illness from reaching our shores. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and colleagues sent...
Rubio y Colegas a Biden: Prohiba los Viajes Procedentes de China para Evitar la Propagación de Enfermedades Misteriosas
Una misteriosa enfermedad respiratoria se está propagando una vez más en China. Hasta que sepamos más sobre lo que podría ser un nuevo patógeno, EE.UU. debe hacer todo lo posible para evitar que la enfermedad llegue a nuestras costas. El senador estadounidense Marco...
El 21 de diciembre del 2023 expirarán las sanciones del gobierno de EE.UU. contra el narco-dictador venezolano Nicolás Maduro y 150 miembros de su régimen criminal, quienes son responsables de abusos contra los DDHH. del pueblo venezolano. El senador estadounidense...
On December 21, 2023, the U.S. government’s sanctions against Venezuela’s narco-dictator Nicolás Maduro, and 150 members of his criminal regime responsible for human rights abuses against the Venezuelan people, will expire. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL)...
Rubio, Thune, Colleagues Urge Biden Administration to Protect Toddlers From Mask Mandates
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined Senator John Thune (R-SD) and Republican colleagues in urging U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra to rescind an interim final rule (IFR) that places one-size-fits-all federal mandates on Head Start programs across the nation. Included in the IFR is a universal masking requirement for all individuals in a Head Start facility above the age of two, including staff, volunteers, and children. The IFR also requires toddlers to wear masks while they are outside on the playground, and it mandates staff and volunteers to be vaccinated by January 31, 2022.
“Layering inflexible federal mandates onto individual Head Start programs that are experiencing varying COVID-19 transmission levels and that are already complying with guidance from their state and local public health officials, in our view, does not make sense,” the senator wrote. “In addition, this IFR could potentially create conflicts with mandates already established by state and local governments or their prohibition of such mandates.”
Rubio, Thune, and colleagues recently introduced the Preventing Mandates on Toddlers Act, bicameral legislation which would prohibit HHS from implementing or enforcing this IFR.
Click here for a full list of signatures.
The full text of the letter is below.
Dear Secretary Becerra:
On November 30, 2021, an interim final rule (IFR) went into effect that established vaccine and mask mandates on all Head Start and Early Head Start programs across the nation. We write to raise concerns with this IFR, which U.S. district court judges have granted preliminary injunctions against.
Under this IFR, Head Start staff and volunteers are mandated to be vaccinated by January 31, 2022, though there are a very limited set of exemptions. The IFR also requires these individuals wear masks, which extends to the students, including all children two years of age and older.
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, individual Head Start programs have been afforded the flexibility to make decisions about their specific program and the extent to which masking, social distancing, and other COVID-19 precautionary measures and mitigation strategies are necessary, consistent with state and local laws where their programs are located. According to a December 2020 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this flexibility has proven to be effective. The report stated that, “Head Start and Early Head Start programs successfully implemented CDC-recommended mitigation strategies and applied other innovative approaches to limit [COVID-19] transmission among children, teachers, and other staff members […].”
Head Start programs throughout the country have demonstrated that, since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, they are capable of complying with CDC recommendations and state and local health requirements to keep their facilities open and ensure children can safely continue to learn in-person, as well as ensure staff members and volunteers remain healthy. That is why the publication of this IFR, without any input from Head Start staff and parents of Head Start children, is all the more puzzling. Layering inflexible federal mandates onto individual Head Start programs that are experiencing varying COVID-19 transmission levels and that are already complying with guidance from their state and local public health officials, in our view, does not make sense. In addition, this IFR could potentially create conflicts with mandates already established by state and local governments or their prohibition of such mandates.
Beyond the federal overreach, another aspect of this IFR that is equally, if not more disturbing, is the fact that Washington bureaucrats are slapping mask mandates on toddlers. This even applies when these young children are outside on the playground, which defies all logic. For context, even the World Health Organization advises against mask mandates for children five years of age and younger.
Given the concerns outlined above, we request that this IFR be immediately withdrawn. We fear that any enforcement of these mandates could result in Head Start staff quitting their jobs and parents and other individuals choosing not to volunteer. Of even greater concern is that this IFR could also result in families removing their children from these programs, which would leave families with very limited, if any, affordable alternatives.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this urgent request. We believe it deserves your immediate attention and are hopeful that you consider our concerns and rescind this IFR.