A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee recently determined that phenylephrine, an ingredient commonly used to treat sinus and nasal congestion, is ineffective in treating these symptoms. This was apparent from research for years, yet large...
El senador estadounidense Marco Rubio (R-FL) habló con César Grajales de La Poderosa 670 AM en El Panorama Político, sobre la crisis fronteriza, sobre cómo los hispanoamericanos se ven afectados con la realidad del país, sobre los cargos contra el senador Bob Menéndez...
Pregnant students are sometimes discriminated against by their schools, either intentionally or unintentionally and there is a concerning lack of awareness about the resources and rights available to them. Due to a lack of services and discrimination, these women may...
Currently, intelligence community civilians are subject to certain tax penalties for job-related relocation requirements, but active-duty military servicemembers are not subjected to the same penalties. These tax benefits, including the ability to deduct moving...
Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Marco Rubio (R-FL) delivered opening remarks and questioned witnesses at a hearing on countering China’s influence in the United States. Watch Rubio’s opening remarks here as well as Part I and Part II of...
Approximately 302,000 Americans live with spinal cord injuries. To help these people achieve a better quality of life, there is a need to increase education and invest in research. U.S. Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) successfully led a bipartisan...
Rubio Joins Braun, Colleagues in Opposing Democrats’ Attempt to Defund Border Security
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined Senators Mike Braun (R-IN), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) in sending a letter to Senate colleagues pledging not to support any Fiscal Year 2022 spending bills that do not include funding for border security or that authorize the removal of border wall construction.
“We write to express opposition to the partisan funding proposals released this week by Senate Appropriations Committee Democrats. Among many issues, the posted bills fail to provide America’s border agents with the proper security infrastructure necessary to defend America’s southern border from the continued crisis of unrestrained illegal migration,” the senators wrote. “The failure to provide sufficient resources is a continuation of the Biden-Harris Administration’s inability and unwillingness to acknowledge the humanitarian and national security risks created by its open-border policies.”
“The continuation of border security funding, particularly continued funding for physical barrier construction, remains necessary during the continued immigration crisis,” the senators continued. “As such, and in the defense of our nation, we will not offer support for any fiscal year 2022 omnibus agreement that omits this funding or authorizes the administration to remove previously constructed border security measures.”
The full text of the letter is below.
We write to express opposition to the partisan funding proposals released by Senate Appropriations Committee Democrats. Among many issues, the posted bills fail to provide America’s border agents with the proper security infrastructure necessary to defend America’s southern border from the continued crisis of unrestrained illegal migration. The failure to provide sufficient resources is a continuation of the Biden-Harris Administration· s inability and unwillingness to acknowledge the humanitarian and national security risks created by its open border policies. We write to indicate that we will withhold support of any negotiated Fiscal Year 2022 omnibus funding agreement that fails to appropriately fund our nation’s border security.
As you know, the Trump Administration took the security vulnerabilities posed by a porous southern border seriously. On February 15, 2019, President Trump declared the situation at the southern border to be a national emergency. The White House repeatedly extended this emergency status as conditions on the ground necessitated. As recently as January 15, 2021, President Trump signed a Continuation of the National Emergency stating that ··further action is needed to address the humanitarian crisis and to control unlawful migration and the flow of narcotics and criminals across the southern border of the United States.”
Yet, on President Biden’s first day in office, he ordered the termination of the national emergency proclaimed by President Trump, instead opting to ··[direct] a careful review·· of the Administration’s immigration policy. The termination of this proclamation and the rescission of successful Trump-era policies like the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) and the construction of a physical border wall has restricted the resources available to confront the national security crisis on the southern border. The results of President Bi den’s open-borders policy are stark. Since President Bi den was sworn in, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (USCBP) reports that more than 1.3 million migrants have been encountered at the southern border, an increase of 377 percent from a comparable time frame the year prior, a 33 percent increase over levels seen in 2019, and a 154 percent increase from 2018.
To address the humanitarian and security risks at our southern border, Congress, on a bipartisan basis, recently appropriated nearly $6 billion towards the construction of a physical border wall, including $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2021. Yet continued funding was excluded from the Democrat’s Fiscal Year 2022 proposal. Instead. the proposals took steps in the wrong direction, by cutting USCBP·s budget by half a billion dollars, and by including a new policy rider allowing the administration to remove previously constructed border wall.
This funding is omitted despite significant evidence that a physical barrier is a critical tool for America’s border security agents to combat illegal migration, drug smuggling, and human trafficking. On October 29, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security (OHS) reported that the border wall system was successful in reducing illegal entries by 87 percent in certain sectors in comparison to the year prior in addition to reducing drug trafficking into the United States. Financially, OHS reported that one segment of the border barrier in San Diego saves OHS approximately $28 million in salaries due to the reduced manpower requirements.
The continuation of border security funding, particularly continued funding for physical barrier construction, remains necessary during the continued immigration crisis. As such, and in the defense of our nation, we will not offer support for any fiscal year 2022 omnibus agreement that omits this funding or authorizes the administration to remove previously constructed border security measures.