China Daily, a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda publication that caters to English speakers, has actively worked with U.S. news outlets in spreading the party’s lies. No American media outlet should serve as a mouthpiece for the CCP. U.S. Senators...
Huawei: Una amenaza para la independencia de latinoamérica 4 de marzo del 2024 4Asia … La realidad es que los gobiernos en nuestra región que le coquetean a Huawei--el gigante chino de las telecomunicaciones--deben tener cuidado… He estado resaltando la amenaza que...
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream to discuss the illegal migration crisis and Ukraine. Watch the full interview on YouTube and Rumble. On how to resolve the border crisis: “The realistic path forward, if we want to end this...
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) office will host in-person and virtual Mobile Office Hours next week to assist constituents with federal casework issues in their respective local communities. These office hours offer constituents who do not live close to one of...
On March 1, 2024, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni will make her second official visit to the United States. Ahead of this occasion, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) issued a statement highlighting the need to maintain and strengthen U.S.-Italy relations. “Once...
Guatemala is one of seven countries in Latin America and the Caribbean that maintains diplomatic relations with Taiwan. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Tim Kaine (D-VA), John Boozman (R-AR), Roger Wicker...
Rubio, Colleagues Demand Answers on How Biden Administration Plans to “Monitor” New Florida Parental Rights in Education Law
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and 10 Republican members of the Florida delegation sent a letter to U.S. Department of Education Secretary Miguel Cardona demanding answers on how the administration plans to “monitor” the implementation of the State of Florida’s recently enacted Parental Rights in Education Act.
“It is a fundamental right of parents to care, raise, and educate their children,” the lawmakers wrote. “Florida’s law “restricts classroom instruction on topics relating to ‘sexual orientation or gender identity’ in ‘kindergarten through grade [three],’ or that is not ‘age appropriate.’ These sex-based issues are not suitable for classroom instruction with children as young as five. There is a time and place for these sensitive discussions. Indoctrinating a classroom full of kindergarteners on gender identity is not it…”
“Parents have an obligation to care for the wellbeing of their children and a right to determine how and when they are exposed to different subject matters,” the lawmakers continued. Parents and students deserve to know the truth about the Department’s intention to ‘monitor’ their parental decisions.”
U.S Representatives Daniel Webster (R-FL), Byron Donalds (R-FL), Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Bill Posey (R-FL), Carlos Gimenez (R-FL), Greg Steube (R-FL), John Rutherford (R-FL), Scott Franklin (R-FL), Brian Mast (R-FL), and Michael Waltz (R-FL) joined Rubio.
The full text of the letter is below.
Dear Secretary Cardona:
We write with regard to your comments about the State of Florida’s recent enactment and implementation of the Parental Rights in Education Act. You stated that, “Governor DeSantis has chosen to target some of Florida’s most vulnerable students and families, all while under the guise of ‘parents’ rights. . . .” and that the U.S. Department of Education “will be monitoring this law upon implementation to evaluate whether it violates federal civil rights law.” Specifically, we are concerned with how you plan to “monitor” the implementation of this law and how it will impact the rights and privacy of concerned and law-abiding parents.
It is a fundamental right of parents to care, raise, and educate their children. Consistent with that, the provisions under the Parental Rights in Education law ensure Florida schools adopt policies that prioritize the families they serve and not woke ideologies. As a result of the law, parents will be better informed about the wellbeing of their child through its requirement that schools adopt procedures for notifying parents about changes in their child’s mental, emotional, and physical health. The law also requires a right of parental access, which will empower parents and support informed child-rearing decisions. As Governor DeSantis explained, “[p]arents have every right to be informed about services offered to their child at school. . . .” Opponents of the measure deceivingly rely on a provision of the law that restricts classroom instruction on topics relating to “sexual orientation or gender identity” in “kindergarten through grade [three],” or that is not “age appropriate.” These sex-based issues are not suitable for classroom instruction with children as young as five. There is a time and place for these sensitive discussions. Indoctrinating a classroom full of kindergarteners on gender identity is not it.
It should go without saying that we do not send our kids to school so that the schools can raise them, that is properly the job of parents. Nearly a century ago, the Supreme Court recognized as much when it held that “[t]he child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations” and that “parents and guardians [have the right] to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.” We send our children to school to learn how to read, write, and think critically, not how to think about their sexual orientation or gender identity. Parents must bear primary responsibility and final authority over the values and intimate topics that their children might want to discuss or learn about, not the State. This is what the Parental Rights in Education bill confirms into law.
Your claim that the Parental Rights in Education Act is a “guise of ‘parents’ rights’” that ultimately “targets some of Florida’s most vulnerable,” implies that laws which empower parents will lead to poor outcomes for vulnerable students, which is precisely the hubris and entanglement of D.C. politicians that the people of Florida reject. Parents have an obligation to care for the wellbeing of their children and a right to determine how and when they are exposed to different subject matters. Parents and students deserve to know the truth about the Department’s intention to “monitor” their parental decisions. Therefore, we request that you promptly respond to the following questions:
- Should pre-K through third grade students be required to engage in classroom discussions about sexuality and gender identity?
- Do you believe it is acceptable for pre-K through third grade teachers to incorporate topics about sexuality and gender identity into their class curriculums?
- How does the Department view the role of a parent when it comes to their child’s education and well-being?
- In detail, please explain the course of action the Department plans to take in implementing your order to “monitor” the Florida law?
- Will the Department seek to monitor, or ask any other government entity to monitor, parents who exercise their rights under this bill?
- How does the Department intend to protect the right of a parent to care, raise, and educate their child?
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important issue.